30 Seconds SummaryMeta-Analyses Are the Gold Standard for Evidence, but What’s the Value of Gold These Days?
- 85% of the 20 most-cited meta-analyses in strength and conditioning contain at least one statistical error, commonly involving issues like ignoring outliers and misusing statistical values.
- Historical context emphasizes the importance of robust data and appropriate analytical methods in meta-analyses, illustrated by the shortcomings in early 20th-century work on typhoid vaccine efficacy.
- Statistical errors are prevalent in highly cited studies, indicating a need for improved review and educational efforts among researchers to refine meta-analysis practices.
- Common missteps include incorrect effect size calculations due to confusion between standard errors and deviations, and issues with handling within-study correlations and variances.
- Practical applications and a comprehensive checklist are presented to aid in critically evaluating meta-analyses and avoiding common pitfalls.
Stronger By Science
Eric Trexler