30 Seconds Summary
Meta-Analyses Are the Gold Standard for Evidence, but What’s the Value of Gold These Days?

  • 85% of the 20 most-cited meta-analyses in strength and conditioning contain at least one statistical error, commonly involving issues like ignoring outliers and misusing statistical values.
  • Historical context emphasizes the importance of robust data and appropriate analytical methods in meta-analyses, illustrated by the shortcomings in early 20th-century work on typhoid vaccine efficacy.
  • Statistical errors are prevalent in highly cited studies, indicating a need for improved review and educational efforts among researchers to refine meta-analysis practices.
  • Common missteps include incorrect effect size calculations due to confusion between standard errors and deviations, and issues with handling within-study correlations and variances.
  • Practical applications and a comprehensive checklist are presented to aid in critically evaluating meta-analyses and avoiding common pitfalls.

Track & Plan Workouts
with Ease

  • Unlimited workout logs
  • Automatic volume tracking
  • Personalized programs
  • RPE support, rest timer, and more!
WorkoutWise Screenshot

Read Next

How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? New meta-analysis review

Training frequency is a controversial topic. Several studies find benefits of training a muscle more times per week, yet others many find it doesn’t matter. Which studies are right? One way to answer this question is by conducting a meta-analysis to get a sort of ‘weighted average’ of the whole lite…

MennoHenselmans.com

Menno Henselmans

Strength and Physique Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Master List

This comprehensive and skimmable guide compiles and summarizes 50+ systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering strength, hypertrophy, nutrition, and supplementation research.

Stronger By Science

The MASS Team

Research Spotlight: Does Vitamin C enhance recovery?

The study reviewed is “Effects of vitamin C on oxidative stress, inflammation, muscle soreness, and strength following acute exercise: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials” by Righi et al.

Stronger By Science

Eric Trexler

How close to failure should you train?

How close to failure should you train? A recent meta analysis has shaken up the fitness community by concluding that you should train pretty much to failure every set. That seems to be the conclusion. If you read the results at face value. And this has also led to a resurgence of the effective reps…

MennoHenselmans.com

Ivan

Research Spotlight: The interference effect is getting less scary by the day

The study reviewed is “Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” by Schumann et al.

Stronger By Science

Greg Nuckols